There is now.Yeah, there needs to be a "Consoles suck, <3 PC" option.
I didn't pick any of the options. I'm not good at computer games, as they require skill.

Moderator:Æron
Because if I WAS to get a system, I'd want the PS3 over the Wii. If there was a "none" option, I would have went with that.So why did you vote for it if you don't think it's worth the price? That's part of the point.I voted PS3, not that I intend on getting one, but because if I was it would be the way to go for me. I just don't play video games regularly enough anymore (with the exception of Guitar Hero I and II, which are my life, lol) to warrent paying $500-$600 for a new system. That's seems absurd to me.
True, but the Nintendo franchises have been sort of a mixed bag in some people's eyes on the Gamecube. Super Smash Bros. Melee and Metroid Prime were some amazing advancements. But I thought Super Mario Sunshine never captured the utter fun of Super Mario 64. I'd say the same for the Star Fox games and Mario Kart: Double Dash. They all felt a little dispointing to me compared to what was on the 64.You just pointed out the strongest point of every Nintendo console: the great franchises.Now, I've always been a huge Nintendo fanboy and have gotten every one of their systems since the NES (except for the Virtual Boy.......*snicker*). Mainly because I just wanted to play the new Mario, Starfox, etc. But the Wii just irritates me for several reasons:
I don't think that's that's a completely fair statement. After all, realistic graphics didn't exist back then. And going from the Atari to the NES was a graphical achievement for the time. You really can't deny that every system launch has featured a significant upgrade when it comes to graphical capability. I'd play a kick @$$ game with chopped down graphics over something pretty any day of the week. I just can't see buying a whole new system when the power is basically there on the Gamecube. Really the only catch is the Wii-mote, which again goes to personal taste.If graphics were everything, gamers would be touring the Eiffel Tower, the Grand Canyon, Space Needle... etc instead of playing games all the time.2. The graphics - The graphics of the Nintendo Wii back up my point about focusing too much on the gimmick of the controller. Now, graphics are not the most important thing to me when playing a game. However, if I'm going to shell out $250 for a new system, I would expect a significant graphical improvement. But the Wii is only slightly better than the Gamecube. Nintendo's excuse in that respect was so they could keep the system's price low, but once again I feel a move like that doesn't have the loyal gamers best interests at heart. If you can buy Zelda on the Gamecube and the Wii and have them look very much alike, something's very wrong.
The Wii is something like 2x the graphical power of the GameCube. But I don't really care. People bought the NES back in the day, and it wasn't for the realistic graphics. I honestly don't care if I can't see a world reflection in Link's sword, as long as I can kick @$$ with it.
*dosn't gives sandblaster the sarcasm award*PC gaming is great because not only is it super expensive, but it becomes obselete quickly, and has the added bonus of some random computer problem accuring to not let you play the game.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 69 guests