What the crap? D:<

[Trance]

See, a preview or teaser is supposed to make the show look <i>interesting</i>. Not cheesy, not idiotic, but hey, if a show has nothing else, you might just go with what you have. Come on, laser eyes and kung-fu??? GAH!

[Burning Sheep Productions]

Just how do you make the Loonatics look good?

[Zaaphod]

<!--QuoteBegin-Burning Sheep Productions+Mar 10 2005, 08:38 PM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (Burning Sheep Productions @ Mar 10 2005, 08:38 PM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> Just how do you make the Loonatics look good? <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br>Simple. Put 'em all in that anti-toon dip from "Who Framed Roger Rabbit?"<br><br>And Jacob, your Tellytubbies idea is hilarious! <!--emo&:lol:--><img src='http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... /laugh.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='laugh.gif' /><!--endemo-->

[Trance]

If I had cable, it wouldn't matter. But not watching the WB anymore has eliminated, like, 20% of my viewable channels. <!--emo&:P--><img src='http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... tongue.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tongue.gif' /><!--endemo-->

[Muninn]

<!--QuoteBegin-Zaaphod+Mar 11 2005, 05:57 AM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (Zaaphod @ Mar 11 2005, 05:57 AM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> And Jacob, your Tellytubbies idea is hilarious!  <!--emo&:lol:--><img src='http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... /laugh.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='laugh.gif' /><!--endemo--> <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br>Course it is, cause it's EXTREEEEEEEME TO THE MAX!!! <!--emo&:P--><img src='http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... tongue.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tongue.gif' /><!--endemo-->

[Burning Sheep Productions]

<a href='http://www.saveourlooneytunes.com' target='_blank'>Save Our Looney Tunes</a>

[The_Sparrow_]

<!--QuoteBegin-Burning Sheep Productions+May 1 2005, 07:00 PM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (Burning Sheep Productions @ May 1 2005, 07:00 PM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> <a href='http://www.saveourlooneytunes.com' target='_blank'>Save Our Looney Tunes</a> <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br> Signed with something to the effect of. "I'm all for progress, just so long as it isn't progressing off a cliff."

[Tom Flapwell]

I'm having second thoughts about this. Yes, the Loonatics do not look promising at all. But they are not supposed to be replacing the Looney Tunes, according to a WB spokesman. I'm wondering how adults reacted when "Tiny Toon Adventures" was on the horizon: "Oh no, look what they've done to Bugs"? Of course, the Tiny Toons interacted with the Looney Tunes, whose personas remained intact, so any such misconceptions were easily put to rest.

[Bocaj Claw]

I wonder sometimes if the suits at the company ever go like this:<br>"Hey Bob I have this great idea for a new show"<br>"Yeah?"<br>"There will be these, like, superheroes and they'll, like, fight evil... and stuff."<br>"Hmmm. Sounds original. Who are the charecters?"<br>"Ummm..."<br>"Oh never mind, just go grab a set from that recycling bin. Nobody cares about those charecters anymore"<br><br>And there will be uproars of fury/anger at this new show. But i fear that others will watch and enjoy... Those people that find the original show too boring... You know the kind of people. <!--emo&:(--><img src='http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... ns/sad.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='sad.gif' /><!--endemo-->

[The_Sparrow_]

<!--QuoteBegin-Tom Flapwell+May 2 2005, 08:30 AM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (Tom Flapwell @ May 2 2005, 08:30 AM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> I'm having second thoughts about this. Yes, the Loonatics do not look promising at all. But they are not supposed to be replacing the Looney Tunes, according to a WB spokesman. I'm wondering how adults reacted when "Tiny Toon Adventures" was on the horizon: "Oh no, look what they've done to Bugs"? Of course, the Tiny Toons interacted with the Looney Tunes, whose personas remained intact, so any such misconceptions were easily put to rest. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br> Tiny Toons however maintained a simalar atmosphere to the original Looney Toons.

[Henohenomoheji]

I miss the looney toons shows that didn't have any of the cannonical characters in them... like the ones that parody the olympics, the army, and the future... I remember the army one that used to make me laugh...<br><br>"Warning: Secret Army Base!<br>Number of men: censored<br>Number of planes: censored<br>Number of tanks: censored<br>Number of bombs: censored<br>What the men think of the commanding general: CENSORED!!!"<br><br>...or something along those lines. Ah, nostalgia.

[Bocaj Claw]

I remember those actually.

[Ankaris]

<!--QuoteBegin-The_Sparrow_+May 1 2005, 06:55 AM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (The_Sparrow_ @ May 1 2005, 06:55 AM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> <!--QuoteBegin-Burning Sheep Productions+May 1 2005, 07:00 PM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (Burning Sheep Productions @ May 1 2005, 07:00 PM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> <a href='http://www.saveourlooneytunes.com' target='_blank'>Save Our Looney Tunes</a> <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br>Signed with something to the effect of. "I'm all for progress, just so long as it isn't progressing off a cliff." <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br> I have never come quite so close to a spittake as I have when I read that.<br><br>Once I stop rofl-ing, I'm signing that petition!