Tuesday, February 16, 1999: Parting the waters

Revisiting old Ozy & Millie comics.

Moderator:Æron

NonsenseWords
Posts:871
Joined:Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:25 pm
Tuesday, February 16, 1999: Parting the waters

Postby NonsenseWords » Thu Apr 22, 2010 2:22 pm

Image

Hm.


Image

User avatar
Liz
Staff
Posts:1193
Joined:Tue Aug 28, 2007 12:26 am
Location:Virginia
Contact:

Re: Tuesday, February 16, 1999: Parting the waters

Postby Liz » Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:05 pm

MAN THAT SHIT WAS FUN TO DO.

I wish I was 8 again. :C
Image

User avatar
Bocaj Claw
Posts:8523
Joined:Mon Apr 25, 2005 11:31 am
Location:Not Stetson University
Contact:

Re: Tuesday, February 16, 1999: Parting the waters

Postby Bocaj Claw » Fri Apr 23, 2010 10:06 pm

I don't know if that's a Calvin and Hobbes rip-off. I mean, I used to/still do that in the tub. Cause wave dynamics rock.
Splashes are really hard to draw. I mean, it's one of those things that's hard even to find a decent photo reference for -- you have to be an excellent photographer even to capture it on film, and then there's the matter of capturing it with ink lines and mostly solid colors, and... trust me, it's really hard. I don't think I did a great job here, but I suppose it's adequate.

The punch line here is definitely an afterthought. I think this strip exists because I wanted an artistic challenge.
I also remember DCS mentioning in the online commentary that s/he was pleasantly surprised at the complete lack of religious backlash.

Also also, someone find and repost that shaking Millie animation. I think Ms. Mudd found another opportunity for it.
That which does not kill me, cripples me for life.

Image

My deviantART account

NonsenseWords
Posts:871
Joined:Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:25 pm

Re: Tuesday, February 16, 1999: Parting the waters

Postby NonsenseWords » Fri Apr 23, 2010 10:47 pm

S/he doesn't think very highly of religious folk, I guess, if s/he anticipated people getting pissed off at a joke like this.

I know it's not a ripoff, necessarily, but the fact that I immediately flashed back to this particular Calvin & Hobbes when I saw the joke... I imagine there was some amount of 'inspiration'.

I find it amusing that DCS complained about being able to draw water in ink and solid colors and the C&H strip looks fantastic in black-and-white. (I'm not going to deny that water is hard to represent in solid colors and ink, I really do know where he was coming from and I'd say it's a lot harder to do it with block colors than just purely black-and-white, but it's just kinda funny.)

User avatar
Bocaj Claw
Posts:8523
Joined:Mon Apr 25, 2005 11:31 am
Location:Not Stetson University
Contact:

Re: Tuesday, February 16, 1999: Parting the waters

Postby Bocaj Claw » Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:11 pm

Religious types can be touchy and I gather there were a couple real touchy religious types on the olde Ozy and Millie mailing list.
That which does not kill me, cripples me for life.

Image

My deviantART account

Tom_Radigan
Posts:741
Joined:Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:36 pm
Location:Brookfield, Illinois
Contact:

Re: Tuesday, February 16, 1999: Parting the waters

Postby Tom_Radigan » Sat Apr 24, 2010 12:37 am

Religious types can be touchy and I gather there were a couple real touchy religious types on the olde Ozy and Millie mailing list.
I doubt this particular strip could offend the most avid religious fanatics. Unless they would also object to theatrical representations of Biblical stories, such as the three kings coming to see the Christ Child in the manger.

User avatar
Bocaj Claw
Posts:8523
Joined:Mon Apr 25, 2005 11:31 am
Location:Not Stetson University
Contact:

Re: Tuesday, February 16, 1999: Parting the waters

Postby Bocaj Claw » Sat Apr 24, 2010 12:54 am

If I recall, DCS said it while rerunning some of the earlier strips. I can't find the reruns so I can't check so we're off the rails on a crazy train and depending on half-remembered anecdotes and firefly dreams. Cause, you know, the archives got all borked or rearranged or something.
Unless they would also object to theatrical representations of Biblical stories, such as the three kings coming to see the Christ Child in the manger.
Well, I object to that. What, babby Jesus doesn't deserve more than three kings visiting him? It's those kind of secularist humanist rule of three claptrap which has our country in a downward spiral. And only three gifts? I mean, its only the messiah we're talking about and you only bring three gifts? You had to get directions from an astronomical body for crying out loud! And what's with the robes and sandles? You trying to say Jesus was a hippy? Depict the guy in a suit and some Italian leather shoes! He deserves it. He did die for your sins and become part of a complete breakfast.
That which does not kill me, cripples me for life.

Image

My deviantART account


Return to “The O&M Archaeological Committee”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests