Yes, there'l be more

[Elscire]

Or, just neo-classical for that matter, if classical is taken to be the period prior to the revolution.

[Doctor Fred]

neo-class for super-short.

[Random Drama Man]

Who isn't?

[Random Drama Man]

Anxious for the new strips, that is.

[Dr. Doog]

what you mean by neo-classical is an oxymoron. neo-classical actually means a futuristic classical style, or todays style. you mean the retro-style. retro-classical would be redundant. and anybody know when he gets summer break?

[Zylo]

So? There's post-modern right now. Explain that.

[Dr. Doog]

well, post is a prefix meaning after. modern is a root word meaning pretty much current or present, thus, that would be a form of neo, except neo seems more far into the future than postmodern

[Henohenomoheji]

if you build it they will come...<br>if you say it they will spray it...<br>that could be my new sig.<br>does anybody think I need a new sig?

[Tavis]

Well, we <i>could</i> try using the term coined by Jacob.<br><br><!--QuoteBegin-Jacob+Jan 7 2004, 03:38 PM, for the title of his Christmas artwork--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (Jacob @ Jan 7 2004, 03:38 PM, for the title of his Christmas artwork)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> If this was for 2000 i'd have said Millie-nium.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd-->

[spamfish]

Yes, the "Millienium Style" would be an appropriate name for the 2000 style. Sure, it started before the new millinium started(2001), but it's close enough that we can say that it was in preparation for the new millenium.<br>If the style changes much after this break of his, we could call it the "Neo-Millienium" style. Yet another way to confuse newcomers.

[Foxchild]

ok, you've got me onto this now, i'll break it down into sub groups. I'll work on that at some time OTHER than 4 in the morning on a sugar high. <br>*twitch.... tiwitch twitch* ehheeheeee.

[Burning Sheep Productions]

<!--QuoteBegin-Zaaphod+Jan 19 2004, 05:21 PM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (Zaaphod @ Jan 19 2004, 05:21 PM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> That artist (Jeremey Bernal?) is rather fond of R-rated pictures.  Definitely very talented, though. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br>Nah they'd be just above PG-13, R rated they normally have a different look on their face and they wouldn't be posing like that, they'd be more in an arkward posi- I WOULDN'T KNOW, DON'T ASK ME!!

[Henohenomoheji]

wow, from comparison to confusion in nothing flat. I am good.

[Maeglin]

<!--QuoteBegin-Burning Sheep Productions+Jan 20 2004, 05:12 AM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (Burning Sheep Productions @ Jan 20 2004, 05:12 AM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> <!--QuoteBegin-Zaaphod+Jan 19 2004, 05:21 PM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (Zaaphod @ Jan 19 2004, 05:21 PM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> That artist (Jeremey Bernal?) is rather fond of R-rated pictures. Definitely very talented, though. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br>Nah they'd be just above PG-13, R rated they normally have a different look on their face and they wouldn't be posing like that, they'd be more in an arkward posi- I WOULDN'T KNOW, DON'T ASK ME!! <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br>I'm pretty sure that graphic sexual acts and poses count as "R" rated, not to mention full frontal nudity.

[Elscire]

Yes, as am I, having gone off to look at his work. <br>Very good it is too!