Thursday, November 20, 2008
Moderator:Æron
- Dr. Sticks
- Posts:2319
- Joined:Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:48 pm
- Location:Alabama
- Contact:
- LewisTheTank
- Posts:765
- Joined:Sun Aug 24, 2008 7:30 am
- Location:Florida, USA
- Contact:
- cougartiger
- Posts:560
- Joined:Thu Jun 05, 2008 1:53 am
- Location:New Jersey
I did say it was a pet peeve of mine. It's just something that has always bugged me for the exact reasons you mention.That's a matter of preference, not a mistake. I realize it's not easy to design a dress with a hole for a tail that's bigger in the middle than at the end attached to the body (doesn't it press her fur back going thru?), but it looks more decent than a design that would expose her underwear with a wag.DCS did make a common mistake all cartoonists make: Millie's tail should be peeking out from under the dress, not poking out from the back of it.
I always figured that instead of a hole for the tail, underwear and pants come with a slit that is fastened with a button. Makes more sense.
As for her tail exposing her underwear, I doubt Millie wears any. Plus, the weight of the dress would keep her from raising her tail too high.
Millie's mother stated that Millie has a lucky (or was it magic) pair of underwear. I assume Millie wears it since luck (or magic)doesn't work if you don't wear it.
- Steve the Pocket
- Posts:2271
- Joined:Wed May 19, 2004 10:04 pm
Yeah. Clearly fanfiction.net is the work of Satan.That's why God gave us fanfiction.net.So am I, but our hopes have little bearing on the probability of DCS's decisions.
true, true. I just like to keep my hopes as a personal fantasy.
...I did not just type that. >_<
OK. pants it. I lied. It's drum and bass. What you gonna do?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests