stuff by a friend of mine

[Steve the Pocket]

My friend Jen, who I managed to get hooked on Ozy and Millie, has been doodling fanart lately and sending me the JPEGs. For someone who I didn't even know could draw, they're pretty awesome. She said she doesn't see herself joining this place anytime soon, so I offered to post them here for her. Here they are (sorry, my host doesn't seem to allow linking to images).

[Holyman83]

hehe I like the Starwars one

[Tum0spoo]

My friend Jen, whom I managed to get hooked on Ozy and Millie, has been doodling fanart lately and sending me the JPEGs. For someone whom I didn't even know could draw, they're pretty awesome. She said she doesn't see herself joining this place anytime soon, so I offered to post them here for her. Here they are (sorry, my host doesn't seem to allow linking to images).

<Grammer Nazi>
And Those are cool. Better than i could hope for.

[Gizensha]

And, risking bringing up something that failed to be resolved on elsewhere...

What exactly is the difference between the use of the words whom and who?

...Though I would contend that the second who probably should have been a that.

[Tom Flapwell]

"Who" is the subject and "whom" is the object, rather like the difference between, say, "I" and "me." It gets a little confusing because of the unique syntax. Some linguists say that "whom" is on its way out there.

[Mazz]

tell your friend these rock.

I expecially like the "would it be ok if I showed I cared about this by not caring?" one.

[Gizensha]

"Who" is the subject and "whom" is the object, rather like the difference between, say, "I" and "me." It gets a little confusing because of the unique syntax. Some linguists say that "whom" is on its way out there.

Do bear in mind that I haven't actually been formally taught grammar, really, so I have no clue what youmean by subjects and objects.

[Muninn]

Those are all great pictures.

[Rooster]

Cool pics.

As for the grammer thing, I ain't got a problem with it. I type the way I talk, so it's kind of a garbled mess of northern English and US skate-slang.

Dude.

[Zaaphod]

Those are excellent!

As for the grammar nonsense, the Ozy T-shirt design she drew sums up my feelings about it.

[Blue Blur]

Oh man, this sucks, I'd just finished writing a Satr Wars spoof based on that pic, and my pc crashed! Bah, evil dust creature, die! Er... actually, don't.

[GhostWay]

I misread that as "Satyr Wars" at first and instantly thought of a half-man-half-goat Jedi with a panpipe for a lightsaber.

Ahem. Sorry.

Nice art, there. The mythologist in me especially likes the egyptian one. (Even though there's no mythology involved. But that's besides the point.)

[Lissou]

"Who" is the subject and "whom" is the object, rather like the difference between, say, "I" and "me." It gets a little confusing because of the unique syntax. Some linguists say that "whom" is on its way out there.

Do bear in mind that I haven't actually been formally taught grammar, really, so I have no clue what youmean by subjects and objects.

Let's try with examples, you might get it more easily that way.

I have a friend. My friend likes cats.
I have a friend. I like my friend.

On the first sentence the subject (the person doing something, here, liking) is the same, so it would become "I have a friend who likes cats".
On the second one, the subject is different. The friend becomes the object: instead of liking, the friend is liked. The sentece will be "I have a friend whom I like"

[Rooster]

Grammar is the last desperate refuge of the pendantic.

[DesertFoxCat]

Grammar is rammarg spelled backwards.