E.Ts
Moderator:Æron
- Caoimhin
- Posts:1063
- Joined:Thu Jul 14, 2005 8:14 pm
- Location:In the magical land of Jersey... Watch your step and don't trip on the cows.
They all just look like cave paintings or hieroglyphs and the like to me. Even that one at the very bottom that looks like a spaceship. If you look at it closely it can resemble a very stylized eagle, kinda like those found in Mesoamerican cultures. Personally I voted "I don't care," because either way I just don't care.There's good evidence that Ufos have visited us in the past. My friend told me that he saw on the history channel that the acient egytian heiroglyphs showed beings flying in the air in space crafts. The gods that they worshiped had large and oval heads.
Debunk this skeptics.
In 1897 in Arora Texas, there was sighted a cigar shape object that crashed into a windmill. In the crash debris there was found a dead piolit. Keep in mind that this was 6 years before the creation of the airplane by the wright brothers. Anyway the towns people buried the piolit in a unmarked grave and dumped the debris in a well. When they discovered that water extracted from the well caused sickness, the townspeople decided to cover the well.
In 1897 in Arora Texas, there was sighted a cigar shape object that crashed into a windmill. In the crash debris there was found a dead piolit. Keep in mind that this was 6 years before the creation of the airplane by the wright brothers. Anyway the towns people buried the piolit in a unmarked grave and dumped the debris in a well. When they discovered that water extracted from the well caused sickness, the townspeople decided to cover the well.
Pics or it didn't happen. You can't believe everything you read.Debunk this skeptics.
In 1897 in Arora Texas, there was sighted a cigar shape object that crashed into a windmill. In the crash debris there was found a dead piolit. Keep in mind that this was 6 years before the creation of the airplane by the wright brothers. Anyway the towns people buried the piolit in a unmarked grave and dumped the debris in a well. When they discovered that water extracted from the well caused sickness, the townspeople decided to cover the well.

OK. pants it. I lied. It's drum and bass. What you gonna do?
Which means that any story from back then, without sufficient written corroboratory evidence, should be taken with more than just a pinch of salt.It was in 18 frickin 97 Cameras back then took over a minute to take. Use your head!
If you do not repent, I will come to you and remove your lampstand from its place. (Revelation 2:5, NIV)
Josh Woodward, Ohio Singer/Songwriter, offers his songs for free. Give him a listen.
Josh Woodward, Ohio Singer/Songwriter, offers his songs for free. Give him a listen.
A dash of salt, then?Which means that any story from back then, without sufficient written corroboratory evidence, should be taken with more than just a pinch of salt.It was in 18 frickin 97 Cameras back then took over a minute to take. Use your head!
Or, in my ever-so-humble opinion, roughly one metric shit-ton of it.
Anami and Anami are sitting around Anami says "GRR I AM ANGSTY LET'S EXPRESS ANGST" and so Anami says "ONE OF THE MODS ON DC IS A DICK I POSTED A PICTURE THAT WASN'T REALLY THAT INAPPROPRIATE AND THREE MODS SAW IT AND DID NOTHING THEN A FOURTH ONE SAW IT AND DELETED IT" and Anami says "OMG I HATE MODS >:("
- Dr. Sticks
- Posts:2319
- Joined:Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:48 pm
- Location:Alabama
- Contact:
err, it's not weird that people threw garbage in their drinking water, and then got sick after drinking it. The article doesn't say whether the apparatus was wooden or MEHTUL, but I think it's safe to say that it was probably dirty, or was made of material that would be harmful to humans if submerged in their well water.
as for the flying object, well that could have easily been catapulted rather than "flown"
as for the flying object, well that could have easily been catapulted rather than "flown"
http://www.spingain.com/?ref=146518
Well put doog. You never posted anything offensive whatsoever
we know she'll be back, like a good bitch should.
or even easier to have been some crackpot inventors home build airship...which would fit the description and the timeline.err, it's not weird that people threw garbage in their drinking water, and then got sick after drinking it. The article doesn't say whether the apparatus was wooden or MEHTUL, but I think it's safe to say that it was probably dirty, or was made of material that would be harmful to humans if submerged in their well water.
as for the flying object, well that could have easily been catapulted rather than "flown"
I don't believe Roger's little story from what he said so far but this comment is a perfectly distressing attitude of our times.Which means that any story from back then, without sufficient written corroboratory evidence, should be taken with more than just a pinch of salt.It was in 18 frickin 97 Cameras back then took over a minute to take. Use your head!
I am a firm believer in extraordinary claims requiring extraordinary evidence. "Bill the farmer went to town on a horse in 1884" I will happily accept without a second glance; "there was a small peanut war in the village of East Cromley in 1912" would require a couple of corroborating testimonies or acceptance by a respected historical body. "Aliens lived in my back yard in 1742" is something which I wouldn't accept without significant corroboratory evidence and published papers.I don't believe Roger's little story from what he said so far but this comment is a perfectly distressing attitude of our times.
I don't think it's dangerous to be sceptical; merely sensible. One can't believe everything.
If you do not repent, I will come to you and remove your lampstand from its place. (Revelation 2:5, NIV)
Josh Woodward, Ohio Singer/Songwriter, offers his songs for free. Give him a listen.
Josh Woodward, Ohio Singer/Songwriter, offers his songs for free. Give him a listen.
- Dr. Sticks
- Posts:2319
- Joined:Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:48 pm
- Location:Alabama
- Contact:
yeah, I do agree with you Jack that people care way too much about "seeing when they believe" and "having definitive evidence". It is important to stress evidence and proof in certain situations, but a whole you should develop an idea of sources that are "generally true" and sources that are "generally false" based on their integrity, and take people for their word rather than insist that someone's lying simply because you didn't see the events they describe personally.
http://www.spingain.com/?ref=146518
Well put doog. You never posted anything offensive whatsoever
we know she'll be back, like a good bitch should.
If anything is worth my belief it should be scientifically testable. If fairies, dwarves and spirits exist, then science should be able to find them. If it cannot, then for all I care they do not exist because I have no evidence to suggest that they do. If strong evidence arises for the existence of such things, then they become 'scientific' and I would be happy to accept their existence.
If you are referring, obliquely, to the discussion we had about alternate dimensions and drugs and such, my position is that I refuse to believe that the hallucinations which these people perceived are of real things unless the results are inexplicable via more conventional methods. I am of the opinion that it is a purely psychological phenomenon which, if undetectable by other means, may as well be imagined even if it is not possible to prove that it certainly is. I liken it to the purely philosophical question of whether the world exists physically at all. It is perfectly possible that does not - that it is a product of some mind or vast computer - but that does not matter; physical is only as we experience it.
If you are referring, obliquely, to the discussion we had about alternate dimensions and drugs and such, my position is that I refuse to believe that the hallucinations which these people perceived are of real things unless the results are inexplicable via more conventional methods. I am of the opinion that it is a purely psychological phenomenon which, if undetectable by other means, may as well be imagined even if it is not possible to prove that it certainly is. I liken it to the purely philosophical question of whether the world exists physically at all. It is perfectly possible that does not - that it is a product of some mind or vast computer - but that does not matter; physical is only as we experience it.
If you do not repent, I will come to you and remove your lampstand from its place. (Revelation 2:5, NIV)
Josh Woodward, Ohio Singer/Songwriter, offers his songs for free. Give him a listen.
Josh Woodward, Ohio Singer/Songwriter, offers his songs for free. Give him a listen.
Previous post was sloppy, here's a better one.
The difference here is that while you're ready to dismiss outlandish reports unsuited to contemporary scientific theories and respond in a way to disprove them, I ask how it could be so and am intrigued by new ideas on their own without the constant need to see if they measure up to scientific dogma.
Sorry if that comes off as harsh, I was just reading about Marcelino Sanz de Sautuola.
No, I'm willing to bet if there existed a written, drawn and built record that spanned the centuries before cameras and mass media made evidence what it is you'd still be unfavourable to such claims.I am a firm believer in extraordinary claims requiring extraordinary evidence. "Bill the farmer went to town on a horse in 1884" I will happily accept without a second glance; "there was a small peanut war in the village of East Cromley in 1912" would require a couple of corroborating testimonies or acceptance by a respected historical body. "Aliens lived in my back yard in 1742" is something which I wouldn't accept without significant corroboratory evidence and published papers.
The difference here is that while you're ready to dismiss outlandish reports unsuited to contemporary scientific theories and respond in a way to disprove them, I ask how it could be so and am intrigued by new ideas on their own without the constant need to see if they measure up to scientific dogma.
Sorry if that comes off as harsh, I was just reading about Marcelino Sanz de Sautuola.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests