Page 1 of 1
Wednesday, March 29, 2000: "Should"
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:06 pm
by NonsenseWords
That's a really awkward punchline, although I am inexplicably tickled by the third panel. That would have been a good place to end the comic, unless you really needed a Millie reaction shot (in which case she should have just facepalmed or walked off-panel while throwing away the paper. Ah well.)
Re: Wednesday, March 29, 2000: "Should"
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:45 pm
by Maggot Brain
I recommend right clicking over the last panel so that menu comes down and covers it. Then it's pretty funny.
Re: Wednesday, March 29, 2000: "Should"
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 11:33 pm
by NonsenseWords
Brilliant!
Re: Wednesday, March 29, 2000: "Should"
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 12:53 am
by Cactus Jack
What should Gandhi have been paid for doing? Also didn't he live in poverty by choice?
Re: Wednesday, March 29, 2000: "Should"
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 7:32 am
by Tom_Radigan
What should Gandhi have been paid for doing? Also didn't he live in poverty by choice?
Well, yes. He was in fact a successful lawyer.
Re: Wednesday, March 29, 2000: "Should"
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 5:19 pm
by Muninn
Well I'm guessing Millie is just thinking why a person who has done much less in her eyes is making more money than someone more important to her. It's the typical fallacy of equating a successful life with income levels.