Page 1 of 1

Thursday, March 16, 2000: Locke's pirate booty

Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:45 am
by NonsenseWords
Image
We don't need Millie back. Locke's kind of awesome.

Also, kid; you got two working hands, don't you?

Re: Thursday, March 16, 2000: Locke's pirate booty

Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2010 2:57 am
by cougartiger
We don't need Millie back. Locke's kind of awesome.
Heck, I've been saying that for years. :locke: :wag: :wink:

Re: Thursday, March 16, 2000: Locke's pirate booty

Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2010 5:47 am
by Cactus Jack
Part of why he is awesome is because he isn't around enough to be lame

Re: Thursday, March 16, 2000: Locke's pirate booty

Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2010 5:11 pm
by Muninn
The frequency of the character appearing has nothing to do with that. Minor characters can be as annoying as any regular ones.

Re: Thursday, March 16, 2000: Locke's pirate booty

Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2010 7:30 pm
by Cactus Jack
The more a character shows up the greater chances there are of him being flanderized, the fewer creative ideas there are for the character, and the greater the chances for a character to be in a bit that isn't any good.

Re: Thursday, March 16, 2000: Locke's pirate booty

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2010 5:03 pm
by Muninn
I guess it has to do with the character really. Some minor characters in Ozy and Millie, like Lyndon irked me more than the most frequently featured. Locke has been one of my favourites always and I don't think I'd get tired of a comic about him pirating.