Tuesday, December 29, 1998: Naughty and nice

Revisiting old Ozy & Millie comics.

Moderator:Æron

NonsenseWords
Posts:871
Joined:Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:25 pm
Tuesday, December 29, 1998: Naughty and nice

Postby NonsenseWords » Sun Apr 04, 2010 2:12 pm

Image
This one strikes me as odd, when only a few days ago Ozy and Millie were discussing whether there even is a Santa; a discussion that usually only crops up when somebody becomes skeptical...

User avatar
Maggot Brain
Posts:535
Joined:Fri Jul 24, 2009 3:12 am
Location:In a van...down by the river

Re: Tuesday, December 29, 1998: Naughty and nice

Postby Maggot Brain » Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:25 pm

Did kids ever actually talk like that?

osprey
Posts:5969
Joined:Wed Jun 14, 2006 2:48 pm
Location:Montreal, QC

Re: Tuesday, December 29, 1998: Naughty and nice

Postby osprey » Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:56 pm

I never noticed this before, but there's a lot of talk about brand name clothes in the early strip. Something DCS was teased about maybe?
Image
OK. pants it. I lied. It's drum and bass. What you gonna do?

Dr. Dos
Posts:1329
Joined:Fri Oct 31, 2003 11:14 pm
Location:Scabsboro
Contact:

Re: Tuesday, December 29, 1998: Naughty and nice

Postby Dr. Dos » Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:07 pm

I've always heard of being made fun of for not wearing certain kinds of clothes in media, but never knew of anybody in real life who did get insulted.

I mean, they would for an ugly shirt, but not for a certain brand of shirt.
Anami: Sex with a giant, black scorpion seems fun.

<SteveThePocket> Geez. I want more of this stuff now. Now I know how a horny guy on an imageboard feels.

User avatar
Arloest
Moderator (retired)
Posts:4550
Joined:Mon Jan 12, 2004 3:59 am
Location:Houston, TX

Re: Tuesday, December 29, 1998: Naughty and nice

Postby Arloest » Sun Apr 04, 2010 11:11 pm

You guys weren't girls.
Who sleeps shall awake, greeting the shadows from the sun
Who sleeps shall awake, looking through the window of our lives
Waiting for the moment to arrive...
Show us the silence in the rise,
So that we may someday understand...

User avatar
Maggot Brain
Posts:535
Joined:Fri Jul 24, 2009 3:12 am
Location:In a van...down by the river

Re: Tuesday, December 29, 1998: Naughty and nice

Postby Maggot Brain » Mon Apr 05, 2010 12:00 am

You guys weren't girls.
You don't know my life. :mad:

Tom_Radigan
Posts:741
Joined:Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:36 pm
Location:Brookfield, Illinois
Contact:

Re: Tuesday, December 29, 1998: Naughty and nice

Postby Tom_Radigan » Mon Apr 05, 2010 1:52 am

OK, I'm unclear. Who among here, besides DCS, are genuine transsexuals?

NonsenseWords
Posts:871
Joined:Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:25 pm

Re: Tuesday, December 29, 1998: Naughty and nice

Postby NonsenseWords » Mon Apr 05, 2010 2:48 am

What do transsexuals have to do with it? At this point in time, I was under the impression that DCS was very most definitely a man.
You guys weren't girls.
As a matter of fact, I was. I still am.

And I can pretty safely say that I have never encountered a girl who would giggle at you for not wearing designer clothes. This is a pretty bizarre fascination. Seems that DCS had issues with designer clothes.

User avatar
Bocaj Claw
Posts:8523
Joined:Mon Apr 25, 2005 11:31 am
Location:Not Stetson University
Contact:

Re: Tuesday, December 29, 1998: Naughty and nice

Postby Bocaj Claw » Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:44 am

I knew some pretty horrible kids, and I can't remember a one of them being denied presents for sheer naughtiness. That's actually the least plausible part of the whole Santa thing, when you think about it.
That which does not kill me, cripples me for life.

Image

My deviantART account

User avatar
Arloest
Moderator (retired)
Posts:4550
Joined:Mon Jan 12, 2004 3:59 am
Location:Houston, TX

Re: Tuesday, December 29, 1998: Naughty and nice

Postby Arloest » Mon Apr 05, 2010 5:21 am

You guys weren't girls.
As a matter of fact, I was. I still am.

And I can pretty safely say that I have never encountered a girl who would giggle at you for not wearing designer clothes. This is a pretty bizarre fascination. Seems that DCS had issues with designer clothes.
I knew you were; I was just referring to the guys up top who were questioning this.

Also, while designer clothes weren't a very common subject of ridicule, and never overt, I've witnessed it happen. But only once. And it was more of a "oh... that's nice... my grandma sometimes shops at the bargain bin too" condescending piece of shit comment made while flashing her Banana Republic stuff than anything.
Who sleeps shall awake, greeting the shadows from the sun
Who sleeps shall awake, looking through the window of our lives
Waiting for the moment to arrive...
Show us the silence in the rise,
So that we may someday understand...

Cactus Jack
Posts:726
Joined:Tue May 12, 2009 3:34 pm

Re: Tuesday, December 29, 1998: Naughty and nice

Postby Cactus Jack » Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:09 pm

I think people may rip on others for not having brand name clothes in the sense that the person without is wearing something deemed ugly or unfashionable, but a person straight up saying "Ha ha that shirt is a generic brand" seems pretty wack to me. Really, don't all clothes not made at home have some sort of brand? It might not be popular or cool but somebody had to make it, they didn't just pick it off a shirt bush.

User avatar
cougartiger
Posts:560
Joined:Thu Jun 05, 2008 1:53 am
Location:New Jersey

Re: Tuesday, December 29, 1998: Naughty and nice

Postby cougartiger » Thu Apr 08, 2010 3:48 am

I wore generic clothes all through school and never once got ragged on for it. Heck, I'm STILL wearing generic clothes and no one cares.

That said, I always like that cat girl in Felicia's group. She disappeared after a while though. :(
My Deviant Art page, home of my epic biography of Captain Lucius Locke, The Pirate's Tale.
Now including artwork!

http://cougartiger.deviantart.com/

User avatar
likeafox
Administrator
Posts:1841
Joined:Sat Oct 18, 2003 10:32 pm
Location:Canada
Contact:

Re: Tuesday, December 29, 1998: Naughty and nice

Postby likeafox » Tue May 18, 2010 7:39 am

I don't think this brand-name obsession is an obsession, but a form of laziness from having to come up with new types of scathing remarks. I think it's meant to be taken as generic ridicule in many cases, and the subject of ridicule itself is not meant to be the focus. That lazy device may come from DCS's tendency of categorizing of sheeple/bull-headed characters. The laziness of the device he uses may itself represent the simple-mindedness of such characters, its recurrence being an exaggeration, if you will. Still, not something to be taken for its face value, but reduced to its generic form. Simply ridicule.

As for brand-name ridicule, although it is hard to imagine it on a playground between 8-year-olds, I know it is rampant in some places. I have a friend who is into lolita fasion and have heard and heard of some of the nastiest things between the girls in that scene, regarding brand-names.


Return to “The O&M Archaeological Committee”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests