
I admit it. I giggled.
Moderator:Æron
I think it's not that being annoying and stuck up comes from brand names but popular kids tend to go for such clothes as a way to flaunt themselves. And I'm making a distinction here between cool and popular as well as evil and annoying, which is the vibe I got from these comics.DCS is always using brand names as an example of why cool people are evil.
I can't cite any sources, but I wonder just how often this can happen, especially in the places where sweatshops are notorious. Unless the state improves itself and nudges the companies to some degree I'd think the enticement of profit from cheap labour in a less fortunate country won't have the corporations jumping to change much.You start with the sweat shops which are better then the alternative, and once standards of living have risen the workers demand better pay and working conditions.
Two known places where it did happen: Great Britain and the United States of America.I can't cite any sources, but I wonder just how often this can happen, especially in the places where sweatshops are notorious. Unless the state improves itself and nudges the companies to some degree I'd think the enticement of profit from cheap labour in a less fortunate country won't have the corporations jumping to change much.You start with the sweat shops which are better then the alternative, and once standards of living have risen the workers demand better pay and working conditions.
Given the stated nature of Millie's quest, it's remarkable that she spends even four panels talking to Avery.
Sometimes I used real brand names, with Avery, and other times, like here, I made them up.
Even if he never wears them himself, he's seen people who do.Shoes? What does Avery know of shoes?!
can't cite any sources, but I wonder just how often this can happen, especially in the places where sweatshops are notorious.
There are far worse places than sweatshops, even in industrial nations.Well that makes it even worse then. You'd expect such "civilised" places to be above that.
Put it this way-you preferred China during the Great Leap Forward or the Cultural Revolution?Most modern industrial nations were not producing cheap goods for wealthy foreigners. I would not yet call it a precedent. Certainly China is emerging from the sweatshop age, but I wouldn't call it fully modernised.
That's no reason to leave them unregulated and have some sort of control against companies exploiting them.There are far worse places than sweatshops, even in industrial nations.Well that makes it even worse then. You'd expect such "civilised" places to be above that.
Return to “The O&M Archaeological Committee”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests