Page 1 of 1
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2004 7:05 pm
by Salad Man
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2004 7:12 pm
by Ozymandias
Ha indeed. Looks like fun for them.
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2004 9:06 pm
by Gizensha
Wait. Some people actually believed that Fox News gave fair and balanced coverage?
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2004 9:18 pm
by VisibilityMissing
If Fox has defined their news as fair and balanced . . . <!--emo&:P--><img src='
http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... tongue.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tongue.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 2:13 am
by Zaaphod
Of course, they're fair and balanced. Just ask anyone who works there, they'll tell you they're fair and balanced. <!--emo&:P--><img src='
http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... tongue.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tongue.gif' /><!--endemo--><br><br>Anyway, I do hope the FCC takes up this complaint. That would be hilarious. Couldn't happen to a better "network" than FOX.<br>
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 2:35 am
by Softpaw
I signed onto this awhile ago. Even if the FCC doesn't take action, it needs to get significant attention. I'm sure the other networks would love to look at Fox, point, laugh, and say "Sucks for you!"
Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2004 4:45 am
by Zylo
That's funny.
Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2004 5:37 am
by Gizensha
<!--QuoteBegin-FelixLockhart+Jul 30 2004, 02:35 AM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (FelixLockhart @ Jul 30 2004, 02:35 AM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> I signed onto this awhile ago. Even if the FCC doesn't take action, it needs to get significant attention. I'm sure the other networks would love to look at Fox, point, laugh, and say "Sucks for you!" <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br> I'd quite like to see Fox News's 'fair and balanced' coverage of this story. <!--emo&:lol:--><img src='
http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... /laugh.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='laugh.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2004 2:03 am
by Zaaphod
<!--QuoteBegin-Gizensha+Jul 31 2004, 10:37 PM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (Gizensha @ Jul 31 2004, 10:37 PM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> I'd quite like to see Fox News's 'fair and balanced' coverage of this story. <!--emo&:lol:--><img src='
http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... /laugh.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='laugh.gif' /><!--endemo--> <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br> *snrrk* They'd blame liberals, Bill Clinton, children of the 60s, etc... you know, those that are responsible for all bad things. <!--emo&:rolleyes:--><img src='
http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... lleyes.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='rolleyes.gif' /><!--endemo--> <br>
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2004 2:44 am
by Softpaw
Don't forget them evil homosexual sinners! They's responsible for 9/11, I tell ya! And AIDS, and cancer, and everything else in the world requiring a scapegoat. It's all the queers' fault!<br><br>Bleh, I feel dirty now... <!--emo&:P--><img src='
http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... tongue.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tongue.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2004 11:42 pm
by norsenerd
<!--QuoteBegin-Gizensha+Jul 29 2004, 04:06 PM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (Gizensha @ Jul 29 2004, 04:06 PM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> Wait. Some people actually believed that Fox News gave fair and balanced coverage? <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br> Yes<br><br><br>I doubt the Bush FCC will take up this complaint. Yay nepotisim!
