Re: Manchester Woman Kills Cat With Crossbow
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:25 am
Animals aren't property they are companions.
Fan forum for Azumanga Daioh and Marty (and O&M to a limited extent)
https://definecynical.net/forum/
This is what I wanted someone to say, thank you. As much as I hate the thought of shooting an animal for the sake of defending one's property and believe it shouldn't be acceptable, I at least can understand it.Ok, if an animal is causing real damage to my property, I'm going to shoot it. I consider my immediate property my territory, and I'll defend it if need be. I don't even remotely agree with what this woman did, but I've had random dogs around here before, and if they had chosen to start wreaking havoc, I probably would've shot them. They didn't, so I didn't. Protection of property is legitimate, within reason. If a dog is digging up your garden, you shouldn't kill it, but if it repeatedly tears the shit out your lawn and topples your garbage and is constantly just a pain in your ass, then I don't disagree with your choice to destroy the trouble maker.Please, give me an example of where it's justifiable to kill a pet because it's harming your property in some way. I would love to hear your logic.
Like I said, my property is my territory, and I'll defend it like any other animal would. I'm just better armed.
I can see I was mistaken. My apologies.I don't believe you should be allowed to kill an animal on your property without a reason, I just don't see why it matters if it is a pet or not.
Please tell me why pet owners can let their pets run wild and do whatever on other people's property? How is that fair?
If that is your stance, then now you're admitting that you're not just killing property, you're killing someone's companion.Animals aren't property they are companions.
First of all, I assume you mean pets.Animals aren't property they are companions.
Why can't they be both if you mean pets? Surely I can still buy a companion at the pet store and have ownership. But that may still not be good enough for y'all so I would suggest we model the 3/5 Compromise for pets.Animals aren't property they are companions.
For a moment I felt like I was reading one of those adventure books where at the end of each chapter you get a few options of what to do and turn to the appropiate page, and that I'd just shot myself in the foot.At this point, you've just shot yourself in the foot.
What you have to do is hold your page when making a decision. This gets difficult if the immediate death from making a wrong choice isn't so immediate.For a moment I felt like I was reading one of those adventure books where at the end of each chapter you get a few options of what to do and turn to the appropiate page, and that I'd just shot myself in the foot.At this point, you've just shot yourself in the foot.
We can return to the spirited conversation now. Maybe I'll make better choices from now on.
Empty? Aww, now wee can't go fishing! oh well, have the internet.... phishing it is.Hey guys, what you want me to do with this empty tin of worms?
D=A wild CAT appeared!
Go! MANCHESTER WOMAN!
CAT used GROWL!
But it failed!
MANCHESTER WOMAN used CROSSBOW!
It's super effective!
CAT fainted!
I LOLED PROFUSELYA wild CAT appeared!
Go! MANCHESTER WOMAN!
CAT used GROWL!
But it failed!
MANCHESTER WOMAN used CROSSBOW!
It's super effective!
CAT fainted!
That was terrible.A wild CAT appeared!
Go! MANCHESTER WOMAN!
CAT used GROWL!
But it failed!
MANCHESTER WOMAN used CROSSBOW!
It's super effective!
CAT fainted!