Page 1 of 2
More birthdays
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 8:21 pm
by Muninn
Happy birthday to Mage.exe who hasn't been seen since November and SapphireAMoerlevad who, I admit, I don't remember at all.
Are all these birthday topics getting to be too much? Just wanted all your opinions whether I should lay off them.
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 8:28 pm
by Tum0spoo
Nah. There's always room for cake.
I remember Mage.exe... I think.
*wheels out a giant cake for all to enjoy*
Though maybe we should only make birthday threads for folks who are actually here?
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 11:36 pm
by Kyler Thatch
Though maybe we should only make birthday threads for folks who are actually here?
Yes, that would be enough.
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 11:50 pm
by Steve the Pocket
Or a pinned multi-purpose thread for all birthday postings. But Kelix's approach works too.
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 12:47 am
by Ibun
Or a pinned multi-purpose thread for all birthday postings.
IAWTC
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:34 pm
by Foxchild
IAWTC

Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:44 pm
by Tom Flapwell
IAWTC = I Agree With This Comment
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:46 pm
by Foxchild
IAWTC = I Agree With This Comment
OIC.

Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:57 pm
by Angstwolf
I didn't know IAWTC either. So I googled it.

Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 2:46 am
by Dr. Doog
I think that for normal members, it's good to have one for individuals (or doubles if it's two on the same day. or triples if it's three on the same day. or quadruples if...)
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 3:46 am
by The Donmeister
Yeah, it's nice to get a post acknowledging your existence every now and then, but it's not really necessary for people who aren't here, as they don't really exist. I like the idea of just posting for members who are active, but still having a separate post for each member (or double).
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 8:45 pm
by Muninn
but it's not really necessary for people who aren't here, as they don't really exist.
Is this like one of those philosophical views that the existence of what you can't see or experience is nonexistant or cannot be proved to be real, as applied to the internet?
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 11:13 pm
by Dr. Doog
it could, however, serve as a reminder of people who are no longer here but who WERE at one time significant posters.
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:34 am
by The Donmeister
but it's not really necessary for people who aren't here, as they don't really exist.
Is this like one of those philosophical views that the existence of what you can't see or experience is nonexistant or cannot be proved to be real, as applied to the internet?
It was actually a joke.
(Apparently a poor one)
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 3:50 pm
by Angstwolf
I'm guessing that Jack got it and just chose to be insane.
(No offense to Jack of course!)