Page 1 of 3
stuff by a friend of mine
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 1:42 pm
by Steve the Pocket
My friend Jen, who I managed to get hooked on Ozy and Millie, has been doodling fanart lately and sending me the JPEGs. For someone who I didn't even know could draw, they're pretty awesome. She said she doesn't see herself joining this place anytime soon, so I offered to post them here for her.
Here they are (sorry, my host doesn't seem to allow linking to images).
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 2:45 pm
by Holyman83
hehe I like the Starwars one
Re: stuff by a friend of mine
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 6:35 pm
by Tum0spoo
My friend Jen,
whom I managed to get hooked on Ozy and Millie, has been doodling fanart lately and sending me the JPEGs. For someone
whom I didn't even know could draw, they're pretty awesome. She said she doesn't see herself joining this place anytime soon, so I offered to post them here for her.
Here they are (sorry, my host doesn't seem to allow linking to images).
<Grammer Nazi>
And Those are cool. Better than i could hope for.
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 7:22 pm
by Gizensha
And, risking bringing up something that failed to be resolved on elsewhere...
What exactly is the difference between the use of the words whom and who?
...Though I would contend that the second who probably should have been a that.
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 7:47 pm
by Tom Flapwell
"Who" is the subject and "whom" is the object, rather like the difference between, say, "I" and "me." It gets a little confusing because of the unique syntax. Some linguists say that "whom" is on its way out there.
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 7:51 pm
by Mazz
tell your friend these rock.
I expecially like the "would it be ok if I showed I cared about this by not caring?" one.
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 8:31 pm
by Gizensha
"Who" is the subject and "whom" is the object, rather like the difference between, say, "I" and "me." It gets a little confusing because of the unique syntax. Some linguists say that "whom" is on its way out there.
Do bear in mind that I haven't actually been formally taught grammar, really, so I have no clue what youmean by subjects and objects.
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 9:21 pm
by Muninn
Those are all great pictures.
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:24 pm
by Rooster
Cool pics.
As for the grammer thing, I ain't got a problem with it. I type the way I talk, so it's kind of a garbled mess of northern English and US skate-slang.
Dude.
Posted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 3:15 am
by Zaaphod
Those are excellent!
As for the grammar nonsense, the Ozy T-shirt design she drew sums up my feelings about it.

Posted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 3:26 am
by Blue Blur
Oh man, this sucks, I'd just finished writing a Satr Wars spoof based on that pic, and my pc crashed! Bah, evil dust creature, die! Er... actually, don't.
Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 5:01 am
by GhostWay
I misread that as "Satyr Wars" at first and instantly thought of a half-man-half-goat Jedi with a panpipe for a lightsaber.
Ahem. Sorry.
Nice art, there. The mythologist in me especially likes the egyptian one. (Even though there's no mythology involved. But that's besides the point.)
Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 5:23 am
by Lissou
"Who" is the subject and "whom" is the object, rather like the difference between, say, "I" and "me." It gets a little confusing because of the unique syntax. Some linguists say that "whom" is on its way out there.
Do bear in mind that I haven't actually been formally taught grammar, really, so I have no clue what youmean by subjects and objects.
Let's try with examples, you might get it more easily that way.
I have a friend. My friend likes cats.
I have a friend. I like my friend.
On the first sentence the subject (the person doing something, here, liking) is the same, so it would become "I have a friend who likes cats".
On the second one, the subject is different. The friend becomes the object: instead of liking, the friend is liked. The sentece will be "I have a friend whom I like"
Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 2:47 pm
by Rooster
Grammar is the last desperate refuge of the pendantic.
Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 10:57 pm
by DesertFoxCat
Grammar is rammarg spelled backwards.