Page 1 of 1
Peace Prize - Friday, October 27th, 2006
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:17 pm
by The MAZZTer
http://www.ozyandmillie.org/2006/om20061027.html
Some ethical theories hold that temptation and restraint is more moral and noble than if there is no temptation in the first place (Kantean ethics, I think). But then this assumes the temptation can't be avoided, thus it wouldn't really apply to Millie... and it would be ethical to NOT place oneself in the position of temptation.
In completely unrelated news, I had an ethics midterm today. >_<
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:34 pm
by Dr. Doog
lol, school
Re: Peace Prize - Friday, October 27th, 2006
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:45 pm
by NHJ BV
http://www.ozyandmillie.org/2006/om20061027.html
Some ethical theories hold that temptation and restraint is more moral and noble than if there is no temptation in the first place (Kantean ethics, I think). I had an ethics midterm today. >_<
I've got a test on city marketing on Monday, and I haven't been able to apply that to an O&M strip, you lucky bastard

Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:47 pm
by The MAZZTer
It helps when you cram over half a dozen ethical models into your brain the night before, pushing everything else out.
Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 2:34 am
by Rymn_the_Silver_Wolfe
I've done that before... only not with ethics... it was more like physics....
Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 10:19 pm
by Tom Flapwell
Recently I said somewhere that I was "tempted" to cuddle a webcomic character. Then I realized that I may have misused the term. Can you be tempted to do something you literally can't?
Whether or not you're more moral for exercising restraint than for living without temptation, the former is certainly more admirable. Anyway, I like Kant.
I also have a history that lets me relate all too well to Millie's incidental habit.

Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 10:32 am
by NHJ BV
Whether or not you're more moral for exercising restraint than for living without temptation, the former is certainly more admirable.
Yeah but the latter is easier

Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 1:54 pm
by CodeCat
Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 3:02 pm
by The MAZZTer
Hmm... since when did they move underwater? >.>
j/k looks nice.

Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 3:18 pm
by Tom Flapwell
I think their fur would be a bit floofier underwater.
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 6:39 pm
by Bocaj Claw
Also wetter. And less dry.