Define Cynical Fan Forums

<a href='http://www.ozyandmillie.org/2005/om20051109.html' target='_blank'>http://www.ozyandmillie.org/2005/om2005 ... ><br>Maybe the sky's plotting against her too. <!--emo&:D--><img src='http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... iggrin.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin.gif' /><!--endemo-->

yes, but she's speculating about it's motive.

is thsi soem coment abotu her own anthroporporhic self?

More gratitious Millie weirdness <!--emo&:lol:--><img src='http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... /laugh.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='laugh.gif' /><!--endemo-->

Actually, the real definition of "anthropomorphic" says that it is anything that acts, think, and behaves like a human. This includes animals, but is more commonly used for innanimate objects and gods. I don't really think Millie looks at herself as being anthropomorphic, since in the O&M world, animals ARE human.

To quote Willie Wonka: "You're really weird."<br><br>That's being directed to Millie.

<!--QuoteBegin-Blue Blur+Nov 9 2005, 10:03 PM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (Blue Blur @ Nov 9 2005, 10:03 PM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> Actually, the real definition of "anthropomorphic" says that it is anything that acts, think, and behaves like a human. This includes animals, but is more commonly used for innanimate objects and gods. I don't really think Millie looks at herself as being anthropomorphic, since in the O&M world, animals ARE human. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br>well... it would be in the same type of way cahracters break the fourth wal or when they sate that their storylines are writen by a realy lazy person.<br><br><img src='http://www.ozyandmillie.org/2003/om20030225.gif' border='0' alt='user posted image' /><br><br>Editt:<br><br><!--QuoteBegin-Joe3210 + Nov 9 2005, 10:04 PM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (Joe3210 @ Nov 9 2005, 10:04 PM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> <br>To quote Willie Wonka: "You're really weird."<br><!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br><img src='http://www.ozyandmillie.org/2002/om20021216.gif' border='0' alt='user posted image' />

Wouldn't a motive be wondering why the sky was crying?

Thanks for that first strip, Millie is so cute in the second panel <!--emo&:wag:--><img src='http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... ailwag.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tailwag.gif' /><!--endemo--> . And "I know," has to be the greatest response to "I'm weird," I've actually said similar things when people say things like that. Well anyway, who doesn't think inanimate objects are plotting against them? Hmmm... My computers looking at me strangely... Crap now it knows I know! No! Not the mouse cord! PLEASE NOOOOAAARRRRGGGGGG!

I like how Millie doesn't even blink an eye on her mother's comment. One of the best strips of the past ~month as far as I'm concerned <!--emo&:lol:--><img src='http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... /laugh.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='laugh.gif' /><!--endemo-->

In most furry, sci-fi, and other communities that I know, "human" and "person" are not synonyms. "Human" refers to a member of the species <i>Homo sapiens</i>, while a "person" is...well, this isn't perfect, but I'd say any life form with an appreciable intelligence or soul. It's almost like the operational Harry Potter distinction between "being" and "beast."<br><br>Humans have been mentioned only once in O&M, and that was an early strip addressing the readers directly from the beginning. The closest they have come to appearing in O&M was when Millie dreamed of meeting famous politicians in humanlike fairy form.<br><br>I would not have used the word "anthropomorphic" in the title of this strip. I'd have said something about personification instead.

Hmmm...<br><br>Now that I look at it, "...ascribe anthropomorphic motives to" probably could have been replaced with personify.<br><br>DCS is probably gonna get some funny e-mails saying "anthro+millie+furry=zOmG11!!111!!!!"

I was going to post something pertaining to the comic, but notpertaining, but the forum is being real mean to me

<!--QuoteBegin-norsenerd+Nov 10 2005, 02:24 AM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (norsenerd @ Nov 10 2005, 02:24 AM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> <img src='http://www.ozyandmillie.org/2003/om20030225.gif' border='0' alt='user posted image' /> <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br>I wouldn't call that Fourth Wall Breaking, because she uses simile rather than directly accusing DCS of it.<br><br><!--QuoteBegin--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> </td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> Now that I look at it, "...ascribe anthropomorphic motives to" probably could have been replaced with personify.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd-->OTOH, I'd say Millie tends to like to use complicated constructions when she's being introspective. Seems to be part of the way her mind works ("Look how good my vocabulary is for a ten-year-old!")

<!--QuoteBegin-Paul.Power+Nov 11 2005, 05:14 AM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (Paul.Power @ Nov 11 2005, 05:14 AM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> I wouldn't call that Fourth Wall Breaking, because she uses simile rather than directly accusing DCS of it. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br>I wasn't saying that this example was breaking the fourth wall. It very clearly is not. The second example is debatable. I would say that yes it is breaking the fourth wall. It has happened other times as well.<br><br>My point is not that Millie is addressing her anthropomorphic self in the universe of the strip but rather that she is referencing her anthropomorphic self in our universe through a construct that bridges the two. The first statement is very clearly wrong but Mr. Simpson has used similar uses to make points that are applicable to himself and what he does. Here is another example: <br><img src='http://www.ozyandmillie.org/2000/om20000626.gif' border='0' alt='user posted image' /><br>I think this is a similar think. Millie is pointing out the nature of her anthropomorphic self relative to our universe by ascribing similar anthropomorphic characteristics to non-sentient things in her universe.<br>