Campaigning by not campaigning

[norsenerd]

It almost hapeed in 2000 for Llewelyn because of Isoldale. If and whoever I vote for in 2004 I will defanatly be at the polls campainging for Llewleyn oposite the democrat and republican caimpaingers. Anybody in Bloomignton Indiana is welcome to join. I already have one vaulunter signed up.

[Sabre]

Im going to get a blimp for my campaign... everybody likes zeppelins.

[norsenerd]

A blimp and a zeplin are diferent things.<br><br>A zeplin has a frame that you fill up. A blimp has a bag.<br><br>Which one is it?

[Foxchild]

I think the "voting by not voting" is what will cause Llewellyns "Downfall" in this election. would make sense. I wonder if islode will be appearing soon...

[Elscire]

<!--QuoteBegin-Gizensha+Feb 24 2004, 08:22 PM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (Gizensha @ Feb 24 2004, 08:22 PM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> If I believed in tactical voting, I'd have to chose between the lesser of two evils that is 'Labour' (Nicely organised but have screwed up the country over the past seven years or so). <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br> Well, I think that Labour managed a better job than Conservative...<br><br>And as far as it goes, I would like to see the Liberal Democrats get in, however we all know how unlikely this is.<br><br>I mean, some people want them in, but traditionally being either Labour or Conservative voters, they may continue to vote that way, the theory being that if they switch vote, then that leaves the other opposition party more likely to get in, and as much as they may want Lib Dem in, there is nothing that they would hate more than seeing the other big party in.<br><br>So they vote the same.<br><br>That may be false, but I'm just trying to fathom people's thinking.

[NHJ BV]

<!--QuoteBegin-FoxChild+Feb 25 2004, 04:50 PM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (FoxChild @ Feb 25 2004, 04:50 PM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> I think the "voting by not voting" is what will cause Llewellyns "Downfall" in this election. would make sense. I wonder if islode will be appearing soon... <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br> Yeah, bring on Isolde <!--emo&B)--><img src='http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... s/cool.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='cool.gif' /><!--endemo-->

[Doctor Fred]

Yeah, it is about time that the 'Llewellyn for President' story line re-occur.

[Zylo]

Given that this year the race is probably going to be Bush and Kerry...bring on Llewelyn, please!

[Jerry Roosevelt]

I'm going to vote for Bob Barker. <!--emo&;)--><img src='http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... s/wink.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='wink.gif' /><!--endemo--><br><br>But yeah, I'm not going to vote for Bush, he's a dunce.<br><br>...did I hear "Isolde"? <!--emo&:D--><img src='http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... iggrin.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin.gif' /><!--endemo--><br><br><br>Vote Zen Party 2004!

[stevemania]

Does anyone notice that Ozzy's facial expressions are more detailed and different??

[Tavis]

So.. does that mean he automatically wins by not winning? Well, that would be on par with his goals the other times he ran for president.

[Zylo]

I think the whole "winning by not-winning" thing only works if the entire political system of the US works on Zen principles. Maybe we should move to China.