Signature size limits

[Sabre]

Everythings lookin good witht this situation.<br><br>5hfifty counqers another problem.<br>all in a superhero's days work I suppose.

[Doctor Fred]

<!--QuoteBegin-Jacob+Jun 16 2004, 01:32 PM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (Jacob @ Jun 16 2004, 01:32 PM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> I think this is good call. When the signature is so much larger then the actual posts, what you've written tends to get swallowed up in between. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br> Totally agree, dude.<br><br>In the eight months I've been here, I believe I've only had one huge-[bad word] signature for the purpose of gloating <a href='http://www.imagemotel.com/uploaded/44GZL73H.jpg' target='_blank'>my 1000th post milestone.</a> I resized it after a few days and then got rid of it once it was old news.

[Burning Sheep Productions]

I remember that, that stretched the page width.

[Ozymandias]

damn, i should really have read this.<br><br>I changed my signature, apologies to all.

[norsenerd]

there was something wrong wiht your sig?

[Ozymandias]

it was too wide.

[Miles E Traysandor]

Did you try resizing it?

[norsenerd]

ahhh... with my hig resolution it wasn;t too wide for me.

[Tavis]

Well, whatever it was, the sig seems to fit without problems on my 800*600 screen (minus the lefty taskbar).

[Ozymandias]

i changed it now

[Sabre]

poor 800x600'ers<br><br>Tear.*

[Softpaw]

Indeed, everyone should be given an ultra-high-resolution 19" monitor or larger so that I wouldn't have to keep adjusting the width of my websites

[Ozymandias]

Meh, I got a 17" monitor in 1995 and its still going strong today in 1024x768 glory. Came free with the PC.

[Zaaphod]

I've tried larger than 800x600 before, but my eyesight's not good enough for the larger resolutions. Oh well... I've learned to deal with it.<br>

[Zylo]

I used to use 800x600, and it was weird when I switched to 1024x786, but it's definately better.