But where is the value in life if you don't question anything?
Questioning stuff is counter-productive. When you question stuff, you imply that they're defective. When you think of it as defective you try to correct it. When you undertake the correction you acknowledge that the defection was there. When you admit yourself to the defection you undermine the position of all associated with the thing that needed correcting. When you see the inherent faults in the previous order that you corrected you realise the holes in its reasoning. When you become aware of the holes you concentrate on their negativeness while discarding the positive aspects. When you focus your attention on the negativeness you accept their importance and you see the patterns of change through progress over history. When you see the patterns you're made aware that your own corrections are merely cosmetic and transitory and that they too will pass and be subject to the same dire criticism. This shows you that your corrections are pointlessly arbitrary. It proves that the old order of things is a failure, unable to sate your fancies, unworkable with the new way questioning has brought, impossible to justify with. Therefore change destroys the set of circumstances familiar/comforting to you and all progress leads to failure. Therefore questioning stuff is counter-productive.
Interesting way of putting it, though I wouldn't personally call it entirely accurate.
Afterall, I'm aware that everything in existence is "defective" through the simple fact that perfection is an impossible concept. The very concept of defectiveness is subjective itself in that its magnitude is entirely relative to the application to which one seeks to apply the object... and all this before one gets to questioning it.
As such... when "defectiveness" or merely "imperfection" is mandatory, one cannot correct nor seek to correct it; merely to change its nature in one direction or other. Objectively speaking that may make the influence mandatory at best, but subjectively it can be in the best interests of the subject to do so.
As for the questioning... it is the means of testing data to determine its validity subjective to other data and forming correlation between them. As such, questioning is a necessary part of truly
forming familiarity and understanding with subjects. If we never questioned anything, none of us would ever have learnt to talk.
Of course, the REALLY simple way of putting things is that I'm not satisfied to merely nod and accept that which is put in front of me, as that requires that I play no part in the process... and have nothing with which to be satisfied. I would rather act and make some sort of mark, even if you consider it entirely arbitrary, than basically to expire myself without applying thought nor effort to anything.
< 
